Russian hacking of the elections, you have to be kidding. We hear all the screaming from the Liberals claiming that Russia influenced the elections. Well, “influenced” is a whole lot different that hacking.

By hacking, I can only assume they are referring to obtaining the non-secure emails from Clinton, Podesta, the DNC, and others. From my research, the accounts were not hacked, but compromised using an elaborate phishing scheme. For the sake of argument, lets assume they were hacked (meaning breaking into them by compromising system security), so what! All that was exposed was the truth. None of the emails were refuted, none were claimed to be fakes, none were claimed to be planted, no “fake emails.”

So what is the big deal? The big deal is that the Democrats were exposed for who they really are, crooked and back stabbing. The Democrats keep screaming for full disclosure and the truth about everything from the Republicans, but when it is their truth is being exposed, they cry foul. It appears the truth is in the eyes of the beholder.

Another issue is blaming the Russians. The is no hard evidence that the compromise of the email accounts were sponsored by any Government. It sounds to blame the Russians, it steers the conversation away the stupidity of the Democrats for allowing their email accounts to be compromised by a ruse. The Democrats keep claiming that Putin preferred Trump over Clinton and that is not saying much (I would have preferred Al Bundy over Clinton). To believe those claims are ludicrous. Trump would drop the hammer on Putin in a split second, while Clinton would threaten to quit allowing the import of Yugos from Russia.

I am just tired of the Democrats crying over something they created. They lost the election because they got exposed.

More disturbing is if the roles were reversed and emails from Republicans were exposed, the Democrats would call it good journalism.

…Odin